What Is Happening in Indian-Administered Kashmir in the Name of “Security”?

5 February kashmir day pakistan india freedom movement

For decades, Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) has remained one of the most militarized regions in the world. Indian authorities maintain that the heavy deployment of forces and extraordinary security laws are necessary to counter militancy and ensure national security. However, for millions of Kashmiris living under these measures, daily life tells a very different story—one marked by surveillance, arbitrary arrests, custodial violence, and a persistent denial of political rights.

This investigative blog examines what Indian forces are doing in Kashmir under the banner of “security”, how these actions affect ordinary civilians, and why Kashmiri people continue to demand the implementation of United Nations resolutions guaranteeing the right of self-determination.


The Security Framework: Laws That Enable Excessive Force

Indian forces in Kashmir operate under special legal protections, most notably:

  • Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA)

  • Public Safety Act (PSA)

  • Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA)

These laws grant sweeping powers, including:

  • Arrest without warrant

  • Prolonged detention without trial

  • Legal immunity for security personnel

Human rights observers argue that such laws create an environment where abuse goes unchecked and accountability is virtually absent.


Human Rights Violations in IIOJK: The Figures That Tell the Story

Below are figures cited by Kashmiri human rights groups documenting alleged violations committed in Indian-administered Kashmir. These numbers are presented to highlight the scale of civilian suffering over time.

HR Violations in IIOJK – January 2026

  • Total Killings: 2

  • Custodial / Fake Encounters: 2

  • Tortured / Critically Injured: 2

  • Arrested: 62

From January 1989 to December 2025

  • Total Killings: 96,483

  • Custodial / Fake Encounter Killings: 7,411

  • Civilians Arrested: 180,080

  • Structures / Houses Destroyed or Damaged: 110,562

  • Women Widowed: 22,991

  • Children Orphaned: 108,007

  • Women Gang-Raped / Molested: 11,269

Since August 5, 2019

(The date India revoked Articles 370 and 35A, removing Kashmir’s special status)

  • Total Killings: 1,050

  • Custodial / Fake Encounter Killings: 287

  • Tortured / Critically Injured: 2,660

  • Arrested: 33,141

  • Arson (Houses, Shops, etc.): 1,168

  • Women Widowed: 83

  • Children Orphaned: 232

  • Women Gang-Raped / Molested: 139

These figures, repeatedly highlighted by rights advocates, suggest that “security operations” have disproportionately impacted civilians rather than addressing political grievances.


Life Under Constant Surveillance

In many parts of Kashmir, daily life unfolds under:

  • Military checkpoints every few kilometers

  • Night raids on homes

  • Internet shutdowns and communication blackouts

  • Fear of detention for political expression

Journalists, students, activists, and even minors have been detained for social media posts or peaceful protests. Critics argue this represents collective punishment, not security enforcement.


Kashmiris and the Demand for UN-Mandated Self-Determination

At the heart of the conflict lies an unresolved political promise. The United Nations Security Council resolutions on Kashmir affirm that the people of Jammu and Kashmir should be allowed to decide their future through a free and impartial plebiscite.

Kashmiris argue that:

  • India’s continued military control violates these resolutions

  • Constitutional changes made in August 2019 were imposed without local consent

  • Genuine peace is impossible without addressing the right of self-determination

For many Kashmiris, resistance is not about violence—it is about political voice, dignity, and international law.


International Silence and the Accountability Gap

Despite repeated reports by international human rights organizations, global response has largely remained muted. Strategic interests, economic ties, and geopolitical alliances often overshadow the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Kashmir.

This silence, activists argue, emboldens further abuses and leaves victims without justice.


Conclusion: Security Cannot Come at the Cost of Humanity

True security cannot be built on fear, mass detentions, or the erosion of basic rights. The situation in Indian-administered Kashmir raises urgent questions about the balance between national security and human dignity.

Without:

  • Accountability for alleged abuses

  • Repeal or reform of draconian laws

  • Meaningful political dialogue

  • Implementation of UN resolutions

the cycle of suffering is likely to continue.

For Kashmiris, the demand is simple yet profound: the right to decide their own future—a right promised but still unfulfilled.


No comments: